Skip Navigation


Review of Finance Advance Access originally published online on March 28, 2008
Review of Finance 2008 12(3):433-463; doi:10.1093/rof/rfn005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/3/433    most recent
rfn005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goetzmann, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Finance Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Equity Portfolio Diversification*

William N. Goetzmann1 and Alok Kumar2

1 School of Management, Yale University
2 McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

This study shows that U.S. individual investors hold under-diversified portfolios, where the level of under-diversification is greater among younger, low-income, less-educated, and less-sophisticated investors. The level of under-diversification is also correlated with investment choices that are consistent with over-confidence, trend-following behavior, and local bias. Furthermore, investors who over-weight stocks with higher volatility and higher skewness are less diversified. In contrast, there is little evidence that portfolio size or transaction costs constrains diversification. Under-diversification is costly to most investors, but a small subset of investors under-diversify because of superior information.


JEL Classification: G11, G12

* We would like to thank two anonymous referees, Mary Bange, Brad Barber, Robert Battalio, John Campbell, Peng Chen, Shane Corwin, Simon Gervais, Hans Heidle, George Korniotis, Sonya Lim, Terrance Odean, Marco Pagano (the editor), Jim Poterba, K. Geert Rouwenhorst, Paul Schultz, Mark Seasholes, Ann Sherman, Meir Statman, Margaret Zhu, Ning Zhu and seminar participants at 2003 University of Pennsylvania Conference on Household Portfolio-Choice and Financial Decision-Making, 2004 DePaul Behavioral Finance Conference, and University of Notre Dame for helpful discussions and valuable comments. We would also like to thank Itamar Simonson for making the investor data available to us, and Brad Barber and Terrance Odean for answering numerous questions about the database. We are responsible for all remaining errors and omissions. This paper also circulated as NBER Working Paper # 8686 and under the title "Why Do Individual Investors Hold Under-Diversified Portfolios?".


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.