Skip Navigation


Review of Finance Advance Access originally published online on September 23, 2008
Review of Finance 2009 13(3):555-575; doi:10.1093/rof/rfn023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/3/555    most recent
rfn023v3
rfn023v2
rfn023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deaves, R.
Right arrow Articles by Luo, G. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Finance Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity

Richard Deaves1,2, Erik Lüders3 and Guo Ying Luo1

1 DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University
2 Center for European Economic Research (ZEW)
3 McKinsey & Company, Inc.

We perform an asset market experiment in order to investigate whether overconfidence induces trading. We investigate three manifestations of overconfidence: calibration-based overconfidence, the better-than-average effect and illusion of control. Novelly, the measure employed for calibration-based overconfidence is task-specific in that it is designed to influence behavior. We find that calibration-based overconfidence does engender additional trade, though the better-than-average also appears to play a role. This is true both at the level of the individual and also at the level of the market. There is little evidence that gender influences trading activity.


JEL Classifications: G10, G11, G12, G14

The authors gratefully acknowledge the co-editor's valuable suggestions in improving the paper's exposition and two anonymous referrers’ valuable comments. In addition, the authors would like to thank the very helpful comments of Lucy Ackert, Ben Amoako-Adu, Bruno Biais, Tim Cason, Narat Charupat, Günter Franke, Simon Gervais, Markus Glaser, Patrik Guggenberger, Michael Haigh, Joachim Inkmann, Marhuenda Joaquin, Alexander Kempf, Brian Kluger, Roman Kraeussl, Bina Lehmann, Tao Lin, Harald Lohre, Greg Lypny, Elizabeth Maynes, Moshe Milevsky, Dean Mountain, Gordon Roberts, Chris Robinson, Stefan Rünzi, Gideon Saar, Dirk Schiereck, Harris Schlesinger, Chuck Schnitzlein, Michael Schröder, Betty Simkins, Brian Smith, Issouf Soumare, Yisong Tian, Chris Veld, Boyce Watkins, Martin Weber and Stephan Wiehler, along with seminar participants from American Finance Association 2005 (Philadelphia), the Economic Science Association 2004 (Amsterdam), the Financial Management Association 2004 (New Orleans), the Financial Management Association European Meeting 2004 (Zurich), European Financial Management Association 2004 (Basle), the Northern Finance Association (St. John's, Newfoundland), the 2004 Symposium for Experimental Finance at the Aston Centre for Experimental Finance (Aston Business School), the 2005 Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Experimental Finance Conference, the University of Köln, the University of Konstanz, McMaster University, the University of Tilburg, Wilfred Laurier University and York University. Valuable technical assistance was provided by Harald Lohre, Amer Mohamed and John O’Brien. Generous financial assistance from ZEW, Institut de Finance Mathématiques de Montréal and SSHRC is gratefully acknowledged. Any views expressed represent those of the authors only and not necessarily those of McKinsey & Company, Inc.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.