Skip Navigation


Review of Finance Advance Access originally published online on June 17, 2009
Review of Finance 2009 13(4):577-627; doi:10.1093/rof/rfp011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/4/577    most recent
rfp011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, U.
Right arrow Articles by Daouk, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Authors 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Finance Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

When No Law is Better Than a Good Law*

Utpal Bhattacharya1 and Hazem Daouk2

1 Indiana University
2 Cornell University

This paper argues, both theoretically and empirically, that sometimes no securities law may be better than a good securities law that is not enforced. The first part of the paper formalizes the sufficient conditions under which this happens for any law. The second part of the paper shows that a specific securities law – the law prohibiting insider trading – may satisfy these conditions. The third part of the paper takes this prediction to the data. We find that the cost of equity actually rises when some countries enact an insider trading law, but do not enforce it.


JEL Classification: G15, G18, K22, K42

* We thank Arturo Bris, Stijn Claessens, Michel Habib, Geoff Miller, Randall Morck, Kazuhiko Ohashi, Paul Tetlock, Sheridan Titman, John Wald and participants in the seminars or conferences at the 2008 American Finance Association Meetings in New Orleans, Bank of Japan, Case Western Reserve University, French Finance Association Meeting, Goethe University, Harvard Law School, Hebrew University, Hitotsubashi University, Indiana University, Istanbul Stock Exchange, KOC, McMaster University, MIT, Purdue University, Rice University, Sabanci University, Shanghai Conference on Corporate Governance, Southern Methodist University, Stockholm School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Texas A&M University, University of Alberta, Universidad de San Andres, Universidad Torcuato di Tella, UC Riverside, UT Austin, UT Dallas, University of Hohenheim, University of Iowa, University of Lugano, University of Missouri-Columbia, UT San Antonio, University of Tokyo, University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, World Bank and Yokohama University for improving the paper. Special thanks go to Guohua Li for being such a careful research assistant. We are grateful to Sam Henkel (www.samhenkel.com/data) for providing some of the liquidity data used in the paper. Hazem Daouk acknowledges financial support from the Peter J. and Stephanie J. Nolan Professorship of Finance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.