Skip Navigation



Review of Finance Advance Access published online on July 17, 2009

Review of Finance, doi:10.1093/rof/rfp013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cartea, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer-Brandis, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Authors 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Finance Association. All right reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How Duration Between Trades of Underlying Securities Affects Option Prices*

Álvaro Cartea1 and Thilo Meyer-Brandis2

1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
2 University of Oslo

We propose a model for stock price dynamics that explicitly incorporates random waiting times between trades, also known as duration, and show how option prices can be calculated using this model. We use ultra-high-frequency data for blue-chip companies to motivate a particular choice of waiting-time distribution and then calibrate risk-neutral parameters from options data. We also show that the convexity commonly observed in implied volatilities may be explained by the presence of duration between trades. Furthermore, we find that, ceteris paribus, implied volatility decreases in the presence of longer durations, a result consistent with the findings of Engle (2000) and Dufour and Engle (2000) which demonstrates the relationship between levels of activity and volatility for stock prices. Finally, by directly employing information given by time-stamps of trades, our approach provides a direct link between the literature on stochastic time changes and business time (see Clark (1973)) and, at the same time, highlights the link between number and time of arrival of transactions with implied volatility and stochastic volatility models.


JEL Classification: G12, G13

* This paper has benefited from comments of seminar participants at The University of Chicago, Federal Reserve Bank Chicago, University of Florence, University of Toronto, University of Oxford, ESSEC, King's College London, Birkbeck-University of London and Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. For comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, we are indebted to G. Amromin, L. Benzoni, R. Brummelhuis, M.G. Figueroa, C. Furfine, H. Geman, S. Howison, A. Ihlan, S. Jaimungal, T. Jenkinson, P. Kyle, D. Marshall, D. Madan, C. Mayer, R. McDonald, R. Oomen, A. Roncoroni, O. Sussman and J. van Bommel. We are also grateful to Peter Bossaerts (the editor) and an anonymous referee for very insightful and useful comments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.